This is an analysis of character introductions used by Hemingway in Across the River and into the Trees.
Action is used four times, Setting twice and Straightforward twice.
With focus on the shooter and from how he is described, it appears this character possess the following traits:
competitive
determined
intrepid
easily offended by criticism.
innovative
very decisive
terse and direct
easily irritated by the lazy or standoffish natures
is happy to force work on another to get what he wants
likely ex-military
possess high ideals
considerate of possibilities
believes in a sense of fair play
methodical
considers the safety of others
modest
pragmatic
careful
adaptable
self controlled
has some insecurity
possess a traditional value system
thinker
planner
The analysis:
They started two hours before daylight.
This shows the character is a determined sportsman. (Time and Place)
Now, the sixth boat turned south into a shallow lagoon.
This shows the character is intrepid because he takes a path the other boats don’t. (Action)
“Be careful,” the poler in the stern said. “Don’t tip the boat over.” “I am a boatman, too,” the shooter said.
This shows that the poler doesn’t think much of the shooter while the shooter is easily offend by criticism. ( Dialogue)
Holding the blade he reached forward and punched the handle through the ice.
This shows the shooter is innovative when confronting problems – in contrast to the poleman, who later on uses the blade part to break the ice. (Action)
“What do you mean, as I wish? You know the water. Is thee water to carry us there?”
This shows the shooter is terse and easily irritated by lazy or standoffish people. (Dialogue)
“It will be daylight before we get there if we don’t hurry.”
This shows the shooter is decisive. (Dialogue)
All right you surly jerk, the shooter thought to himself. We are going to get there. We’ve made two-thirds of the way now and if you are worried about having to work to break ice to pick up birds, that is altogether too bad.“Get your back in it, jerk,” he said in English.
This shows, once again, that he dislikes passive resistance or laziness and is happy to force work on another to get what he wants while still displaying some self control by cursing the poler in a language he can’t understand. (Thought and Dialogue)
The shooter, wearing his hip boots and an old combat jacket, with a patch on the left shoulder that no one understood, and with the slight light patches on the straps, where stars had been removed.
This shows he might be ex-military and possibly angry about something because of the removed stars from the strap. (Straightforward)
The shooter was thirsty from the hard work of breaking the ice and driving the boat in and he felt his anger rise, and then held it, and said, “Can I help you in the boat to break ice to put out the decoys?”
This shows he gets irritated when someone doesn’t help or do his job. It also shows he is able to corral his anger enough to keep it in and is even considerate enough to offer help to the one who is angering him. (Setting and Straightforward)
He’s in a beautiful mood, the shooter thought. He’s a big brute, too. I worked like a horse coming out here. He just pulled his weight and that’s all. What the hell is eating him? This is his trade isn’t it.
He arranged the shooting stool so he would have the maximum swing to the left and right … so he could reach in easily…he loaded both his guns and checked the position of the boat that was putting out the decoys”
This shows the shooter is a planner and is mindful of the danger the poler is in. (Action)
“then without looking at the result of his shot he raised the gun smoothly”
This shows he is methodical, efficient and possibly modest because he doesn’t stop to admire his work with the first shot and maximizes his time when trying to hit the other duck. (Action)
He knew he had shot carefully on the first duck…and on the second duck…to be sure the boat was out of any line of fire…with complete consideration and respect for the position of the boat, and he felt very good as he reloaded.
This shows that he is methodical and avoids recklessness. (Thought)
“I will indeed.”
This shows the shooter has self control because he keeps his anger in and is able to say things counter to his actions. (Thought)
“Get you decoys out,” he called to the man in the boat. “But get them out fast. I won’t shoot until they are all out. Except straight overhead”
This shows the shooter is directive and pragmatic and can adapt to the situation without sacrificing potential gain. (Dialogue)
I can’t figure it, the shooter thought to himself. He knows the game. He knows I split the work, or more, coming out. I never shot a safer or more careful duck in my life than that. What’s the matter with him? I offered to put the dekes out with him. The hell with him.
Here me doth protest too much, which suggest there is an indication that the shooter may be insecure about something. Once again he is a person who expects reciprocity from others and is easily annoyed when others don’t live up to expectations. (Thought)
Don’t let him spoil it, the shooter told himself.
This shows he is capable of emotional self control. (Thought)
You probably will only have a few birds, so don’t let him spoil it for you. You don’t know how many more times you will shoot ducks and do not let anything spoil it for you.
This shows he uses forethought and plans ahead and capable of managing his internal thoughts. He also appears to be worried about the future. (Thought)
Feel free to generate a character introduction using the two new techniques: Thought and Dialogue.
No comments:
Post a Comment